Authors & Affiliations
Avrorin E.N.1, Simonenko V.A.1, Gulevich A.V.2, Chebeskov A.N.2
1 Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Zababakhin All-Russia Research Institute of Technical Physics, Snezhinsk, Russia
2 A.I. Leypunsky Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia
Avrorin E.N. – Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Honorary Scientific Leader, Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Zababakhin All-Russia Research Institute of Technical Physics.
Simonenko V.A. – Deputy Scientific Leader, Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Professor, Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Zababakhin All-Russia Research Institute of Technical Physics.
Chebeskov A.N. – Chief Researcher, Dr. Sci. (Tech.), A.I. Leypunsky Institute for Physics and Power Engineering.
Nuclear power systems have sufficient potential to provide a sustainable source of energy with the ability to meet any reasonable forecast of global energy needs of humankind for a historically significant period, using the technologies of fast reactors and a closed nuclear fuel cycle that have already been tested and demonstrated. The two main nuclear technologies: uranium enrichment and reprocessing of irradiated fuel are a legacy of military activities, that is, they remain "sensitive" and therefore require close attention from the nonproliferation regime of nuclear weapons. In addition, the situation is significantly more complicated if in the sphere of export potential, in addition to reactor technologies, the technologies of radiochemical processing and refubrication of nuclear fuel will be involved in the future, as in the case of fast reactors with a nuclear fuel cycle closure. The report discusses the issues of protection of fast reactors and relevant nuclear fuel cycles from the proliferation of nuclear weapons using knowledge, technology and materials of nuclear energy in military programs. The features of the closed nuclear fuel cycle of fast reactors to maintain the global non-proliferation regime in comparison with the nonclosed cycle of thermal reactors are also discussed.
fast reactor, closed fuel cycle, sustainable development of civilization, non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, physical protection of nuclear facilities and nuclear materials, launch of fast reactors on plutonium and uranium, IAEA safeguards
1. Avrorin E.N., Chebeskov A.N. Fast Reactors and Nuclear Nonproliferation. Proc. Int. Conf. on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Safe Technologies and Sustainable Scenarios (FR13). Paris, France, 2013.
2. Zrodnikov A.V., Kagramanyan V.S., Chebeskov A.N., Poplavskaya E.V. International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Centers in the Global Infrastructure of Nuclear Power (Technological Aspects of the Problem). Proc. Int. Conf. on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Challenges and Opportunities (FR09). Kyoto, Japan, 2009.
3. BRUNDTLAND COMMISSION, "Our Common Future", World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1987.
4. Vvedenie v ispol'zovanie metodologii INPRO dlya otsenki yaderno-energeticheskikh sistem [Introduction to the INPRO methodology for the evaluation of nuclear power systems]. IAEA series No NP-T-1.12, 2011.
5. Informatsionnaya seriya MAGATE: "Yadernaya energetika i ustoychivoe razvitie" [IAEA Information Series: "Nuclear Power and Sustainable Development"]. Available at: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/sustain_rus.pdf (sccessed 13.09.2017).
6. Generation IV Goals. Available at: https://www.gen-4.org/gif/jcms/c_9502/generation-iv-goals (accessed 13.09.2017).
7. Beller D.E., Krakowski R.?. Burnup Dependence of Proliferation Attributes of Plutonium from Spent LWR Fuel. LA-UR99-751, February 1999.
8. Safe handling of plutonium and its storage. Series of the IAEA presentations on safety, no. 9. Moscow, TSNIIATOMINFORM Publ., 2000.
9. Mark J.C. Explosive Properties of Reactor-Grade Plutonium. Science and Global Security, 1993, no. 4, pp. 111-128.
10. Smirnov V.S., Umanskiy A.A. Fast reactor start-up with enriched uranium. Bulletin for nuclear energy, 2008, no. 8.
11. Andreeva K.A., Malenkin D.N., Malysheva I.V. Development and a choice of models to analyze the BN fuel cycle with start up on enriched uranium with gradual transition to breeder mode. Proc. 22th Interdepartmental seminar "Neutron and physical problems of the nuclear power". Obninsk, 2011.
12. Kessler G. Proliferation-Proof Uranium/Plutonium Fuel Cycles. Safeguards and Non-Proliferation. Karlsruhe, KIT Scientific Publ., 2011, 372 p.
13. Sistema garantiy MAGATE [The IAEA safeguards system]. Available at: http://www.pircenter.org/sections/188-sistema-garantij-magate, http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Glossary_russian.pdf (accessed 13.09.2017).
14. Rekomendatsii po fizicheskoy yadernoy bezopasnosti, kasayushchiesya fizicheskoy zashchity yadernykh materialov i yadernykh ustanovok [Recommendations on nuclear security concerning the physical protection of nuclear materials and nuclear facilities] (INFCIRC/225/revision 5). Vienna, IAEA, 2012.
15. International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation. INFCE Working Group reports 1-8. Vienna, IAEA Publ., 1980.
16. orozov I.G., Troyanov M.F., Inyutin E.I., Lytkin V.B. Sostoyanie i problemy toplivnogo tsikla yadernoy energetiki [The state and problems of the nuclear fuel cycle]. Atomnaya energiya - Atomic Energy, 1980, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 343-349.
17. Report from the Commission to the Council International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation, (1980). Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/34085/ (accessed 13.09.2017).